Prediction of Mi-Rae Ham vs Yumi Nakano Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Ham vs Y. Nakano

Mi-Rae Ham

KOR

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

633

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

$3.4K

Plays

Yumi Nakano

JPN

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

633

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

$3.4K

Plays

Head-to-head: Ham 2 - 0 Nakano

They have played 4 sets in total, with Mi-Rae Ham winning 4 and Yumi Nakano winning 0. The last match between Mi-Rae Ham and Yumi Nakano was at the Gimcheon, 29-06-2009, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Mi-Rae Ham getting the victory 6-4 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Ham	2
Nakano	0

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R2) Gimcheon(06-29-09)

Stats

Mi-Rae Ham

Yumi Nakano

(R2) Gimcheon(06-22-09)

Stats

Mi-Rae Ham

Yumi Nakano

M. Ham vs Y. Nakano H2H Profile

M. Ham	Stats	Y. Nakano
$0	Career Prize Money	$3,440
58.95% (56-39)	Career Total W/L	41.40% (118-167)
2	Hard	0
2	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. Ham vs Y. Nakano Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mi-Rae Ham has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Yumi Nakano has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mi-Rae Ham, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Yumi Nakano has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Mi-Rae Ham has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Yumi Nakano has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Mi-Rae Ham has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Yumi Nakano winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Mi-Rae Ham has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 49/33), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 3/3). Yumi Nakano has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/3), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 30% (W/L 6/14).
Player level: In the last year, Mi-Rae Ham has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Yumi Nakano has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Mi-Rae Ham winning 2 times and Yumi Nakano being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Mi-Rae Ham winning 4 and Yumi Nakano winning 0.
The last match between Mi-Rae Ham and Yumi Nakano was at the Gimcheon, 29-06-2009, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Mi-Rae Ham getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mi-Rae Ham has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Yumi Nakano has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mi-Rae Ham has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Yumi Nakano has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Mi-Rae Ham has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Yumi Nakano has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Mi-Rae Ham vs Yumi Nakano Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Ham vs Y. Nakano H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Ham	Stats	Y. Nakano
2	H2H Matches Won	0
4	Sets Won	0
26	Games Won	17
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (2/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Ham Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Istanbul - 23-12-2013
Q1 Ceylin GunayC. Gunay	W	6-0 6-2	Stats
R2 Elise MertensE. Mertens	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
R1 Margarita LazarevaM. Lazareva	W	2-6 6-4 6-3	Stats
Q3 Jaimy-Gayle Van De WalJ. Van	W	6-3 6-1	Stats
Antalya - 16-12-2013
Q3 Darya ChernetsovaD. Chernetsova	W	6-4 6-2	Stats

View All

Y. Nakano Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Hamamatsu - 19-10-2015
Q2 Satsuki ItoS. Ito	W	4-6 6-1 6-4	Stats
Q3 Aya TanakaA. Tanaka	W	6-2 3-6 7-6(5)	Stats
Q1 Riko TachibanaR. Tachibana	W	6-4 6-2	Stats
R1 Reina TakahashiR. Takahashi	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Makinohara - 12-10-2015
Q3 Aya TanakaA. Tanaka	L	6-1 6-1	Stats

View All

M. Ham vs Y. Nakano Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Ham	Stats	Y. Nakano
58.95% (56/39)	YTD Win/Loss	41.40% (118/167)
57.75% (123/90)	Sets Win/Loss	41.86% (270/375)
53.90% (989/846)	Games Win/Loss	46.36% (2681/3102)
59.76% (49/33)	Hard Win/Loss	44.91% (75/92)
50.00% (3/3)	Clay Win/Loss	30.00% (6/14)
57.14% (4/3)	Indoor Hard W/L	39.13% (27/42)
0% (0/0)	Grass Win/Loss	34.48% (10/19)
0	Aces Total	1
0	Double Faults Per Game	0.01
0	Total Double Faults	25
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
515.18	Average Opponent Rank	564.43
0% (0/0)	1st Serve %	68% (193/285)
0% (0/0)	1st Serve Win %	55% (106/193)
0% (0/0)	2nd Serve Win %	36% (33/92)
0% (0/0)	Break Points Won % (Total)	60% (15/25)
0% (0/0)	Return Points Win %	41% (120/293)
0.00% (0/2)	Main Tour W/L	44.44% (4/5)
59.38% (19/13)	Challenger W/L	32.47% (25/52)
60.66% (37/24)	Futures W/L	44.72% (89/110)
60% (56/94)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	41% (117/283)
0% (0/0)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/1)
50% (5/10)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	55% (22/40)
61% (14/23)	Deciding Set Win %	55% (41/75)
92% (52/48)	1st Set Won, Won Match	82% (127/104)
8% (52/4)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	18% (127/23)
21% (43/9)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	9% (158/14)